These bodies show other distinctions from the earlier ones. You can see
some interesting wiggly stuff and so on. Perhaps we're observing a
different stage in their life cycle, or a different variety or species?
They must be quite flat, since they cast no shadows in this or either of
the other two instances. Also as in the other two, they crowd together
along the pond's perimeter.
The scale here measures a relatively crude 5.5 meters per pixel, which as we
already know from the shot of the Darwin pond (4.15
meters per pixel) isn't sufficient to resolve the branches very well... though
you can still see vague hints here and there. This sets a boundary on the maximum
branch thickness at 2 or 3 meters since they DO begin to show up in the Keeler shot at 2.76 meters per pixel.
|